President Trump signed an executive order on Friday banning immigration from seven Muslim-majority countries, suspending refugee admission for 120 days, and mandating that asylum seekers of minority religions from those countries would be given priority. Trump later stated that the latter clause was to enable the prioritization of Christians.
The ACLU has the best summary of how various elements of the executive order may violate the First Amendment. The ACLU and others have filed suit.
There has been controversy over President Trump’s statement memorializing International Holocaust Remembrance Day (also on Friday) because it omitted any mention of Jews. The Administration responded that this was intentional.
A lawsuit has been filed in federal court over Bible study electives offered in Mercer County, West Virginia.
Three judges that could be nominated by President Trump to replace Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court.
California has banned state-funded travel to four other states due to laws considered as discriminatory against LGBT people. The Kansas law in question enables college campus religious groups to require members to maintain religious standards. The Tennessee law allows therapists to reject clients whose goals contradict the therapists’ personal beliefs.
An Iowa security officer filed suit claiming he was fired because he used “In Christ” as part of his email signature.
A lawsuit was filed against North Carolina arguing that its sex offender law was unconstitutional – restricting registered sex offenders from, among other things, attending worship services.
A Texas state legislator is facing criticism over a “survey” he sent to Texas mosques, questioning if they support Shari’a law and the Muslim Brotherhood.
New York City issued a complaint against a contracting company for discrimination against Muslim workers.
A provocative op-ed in Time arguing that the Trump administration’s immigration policies could infringe on church ministries.
A senator in Australia proposed creating a central registry of officiators willing to perform a same-sex wedding, to avoid potential legal tension.